Best Known (91, 143, s)-Nets in Base 8
(91, 143, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 143, 354)-net over F8, using
- 25 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 168, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 84, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 84, 177)-net over F64, using
(91, 143, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(91, 143, 516)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (91, 144, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (55, 108, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 54, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 54, 258)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (55, 108, 516)-net over F16, using
(91, 143, 991)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (91, 143, 991)-net over F8, using
(91, 143, 139681)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 143, 139682)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1386 411618 157083 439043 666931 059582 942146 247752 239288 733843 290391 715642 816634 233528 415496 029055 322649 943712 596910 232207 435639 617200 > 8143 [i]