Best Known (86, 144, s)-Nets in Base 8
(86, 144, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 144, 354)-net over F8, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (86, 158, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 79, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 79, 177)-net over F64, using
(86, 144, 384)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(86, 144, 384)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (14, 72, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (14, 77, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 66, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 66, 192)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (14, 77, 192)-net in base 64, using
(86, 144, 598)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (86, 144, 598)-net over F8, using
(86, 144, 50836)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 144, 50837)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 11092 139611 551957 450058 880404 016472 317062 235241 037932 492504 494526 926931 856542 185455 033405 589243 994645 302781 942266 933525 559713 326848 > 8144 [i]