Best Known (89, 145, s)-Nets in Base 8
(89, 145, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 145, 354)-net over F8, using
- 19 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 164, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
(89, 145, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(89, 145, 432)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (89, 146, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 73, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 73, 216)-net in base 64, using
(89, 145, 738)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (89, 145, 738)-net over F8, using
(89, 145, 76652)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 145, 76653)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 88755 725101 586416 717616 088923 468806 631082 357587 205144 782107 205062 782909 534519 631274 396968 465680 570258 261264 114318 915788 737497 005630 > 8145 [i]