Best Known (77, 146, s)-Nets in Base 8
(77, 146, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (77, 146, 208)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (77, 148, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 74, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 74, 104)-net over F64, using
(77, 146, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(77, 146, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (77, 148, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 111, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 111, 225)-net over F16, using
(77, 146, 301)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (77, 146, 301)-net over F8, using
(77, 146, 13712)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (77, 146, 13713)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (77, 145, 13713)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 88846 692569 941453 862813 904378 238278 416059 327464 548603 944238 352744 994184 842539 205270 561431 631973 919427 299570 316093 990690 876276 514272 > 8145 [i]