Best Known (92, 146, s)-Nets in Base 8
(92, 146, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 146, 354)-net over F8, using
- 24 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (92, 170, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 85, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 85, 177)-net over F64, using
(92, 146, 514)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(92, 146, 514)-net in base 8, using
- 82 times duplication [i] based on (90, 144, 514)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (54, 108, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 54, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 54, 257)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (54, 108, 514)-net over F16, using
(92, 146, 924)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (92, 146, 924)-net over F8, using
(92, 146, 119295)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 146, 119296)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 709937 066756 602211 687299 146768 988927 400044 638755 572969 062912 861865 734245 690560 907716 589244 020366 792399 559269 547070 568372 451714 805345 > 8146 [i]