Best Known (66, 147, s)-Nets in Base 8
(66, 147, 113)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (66, 147, 113)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (66, 148, 113)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 52, 48)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 96, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (11, 52, 48)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(66, 147, 162)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (66, 147, 162)-net over F8, using
(66, 147, 4431)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (66, 147, 4432)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (66, 146, 4432)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 715562 997661 931040 518415 808056 566354 061083 937946 394557 479938 465185 715125 263038 507644 801992 056102 093980 888656 177316 833579 747084 906402 > 8146 [i]