Best Known (90, 148, s)-Nets in Base 8
(90, 148, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 148, 354)-net over F8, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (90, 166, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 83, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 83, 177)-net over F64, using
(90, 148, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(90, 148, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 74, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
(90, 148, 698)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (90, 148, 698)-net over F8, using
(90, 148, 67729)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 148, 67730)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 45 428511 456253 601490 446049 470272 716414 274422 543272 264006 233674 279248 298143 856281 570389 496373 652999 512807 679686 697621 037219 796433 441696 > 8148 [i]