Best Known (89, 150, s)-Nets in Base 8
(89, 150, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 150, 354)-net over F8, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 164, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
(89, 150, 384)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(89, 150, 384)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (14, 75, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (14, 77, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 66, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 66, 192)-net over F128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (14, 77, 192)-net in base 64, using
(89, 150, 592)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (89, 150, 592)-net over F8, using
(89, 150, 52587)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 150, 52588)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 149, 52588)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 363 524452 119717 347032 549527 005069 552653 649728 262657 006483 986479 115440 170822 960127 417992 639323 301334 895350 973646 426492 816078 570067 462808 > 8149 [i]