Best Known (92, 150, s)-Nets in Base 8
(92, 150, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 150, 354)-net over F8, using
- 20 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (92, 170, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 85, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 85, 177)-net over F64, using
(92, 150, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(92, 150, 432)-net in base 8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (92, 152, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 76, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 76, 216)-net in base 64, using
(92, 150, 754)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (92, 150, 754)-net over F8, using
(92, 150, 78176)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 150, 78177)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 2907 486296 359551 558192 504548 223209 872447 428358 427752 984575 092949 910391 151225 193094 587432 632900 532489 637979 448085 006447 900175 566780 875424 > 8150 [i]