Best Known (93, 151, s)-Nets in Base 8
(93, 151, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (93, 151, 354)-net over F8, using
- 21 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
(93, 151, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(93, 151, 432)-net in base 8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (93, 154, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
(93, 151, 783)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (93, 151, 783)-net over F8, using
(93, 151, 83989)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (93, 151, 83990)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 23260 781157 510058 467823 458686 346602 272195 483791 018489 180393 822733 412352 473879 063948 942592 562255 823706 451363 664812 790044 463737 622447 687936 > 8151 [i]