Best Known (96, 152, s)-Nets in Base 8
(96, 152, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 152, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 152, 354)-net over F8, using
- 20 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 20 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(96, 152, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(96, 152, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (20, 76, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (20, 77, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 66, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 66, 288)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (20, 77, 288)-net in base 64, using
(96, 152, 974)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (96, 152, 974)-net over F8, using
(96, 152, 128924)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 152, 128925)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 186077 835091 790679 775400 056155 940057 534618 081559 336853 847980 361275 668020 816388 460740 122419 324918 637270 623230 061386 518180 675019 215245 084825 > 8152 [i]