Best Known (121, 155, s)-Nets in Base 8
(121, 155, 1929)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (121, 155, 1929)-net over F8, using
- 83 times duplication [i] based on digital (118, 152, 1929)-net over F8, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8152, 1929, F8, 34, 34) (dual of [(1929, 34), 65434, 35]-NRT-code), using
- OA 17-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(8152, 32793, F8, 34) (dual of [32793, 32641, 35]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8152, 32794, F8, 34) (dual of [32794, 32642, 35]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(33) ⊂ Ce(28) [i] based on
- linear OA(8146, 32768, F8, 34) (dual of [32768, 32622, 35]-code), using an extension Ce(33) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 32767 = 85−1, defining interval I = [1,33], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 34 [i]
- linear OA(8126, 32768, F8, 29) (dual of [32768, 32642, 30]-code), using an extension Ce(28) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 32767 = 85−1, defining interval I = [1,28], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 29 [i]
- linear OA(86, 26, F8, 4) (dual of [26, 20, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(86, 56, F8, 4) (dual of [56, 50, 5]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(87, 57, F8, 5) (dual of [57, 50, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(86, 56, F8, 4) (dual of [56, 50, 5]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(33) ⊂ Ce(28) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8152, 32794, F8, 34) (dual of [32794, 32642, 35]-code), using
- OA 17-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(8152, 32793, F8, 34) (dual of [32793, 32641, 35]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8152, 1929, F8, 34, 34) (dual of [(1929, 34), 65434, 35]-NRT-code), using
(121, 155, 32829)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (121, 155, 32829)-net over F8, using
(121, 155, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (121, 155, large)-net in base 8, because
- 32 times m-reduction [i] would yield (121, 123, large)-net in base 8, but