Best Known (69, 156, s)-Nets in Base 8
(69, 156, 113)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (69, 156, 113)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (69, 157, 113)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 55, 48)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 102, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (11, 55, 48)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(69, 156, 163)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (69, 156, 163)-net over F8, using
(69, 156, 4314)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (69, 156, 4315)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (69, 155, 4315)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 95 306818 739391 990712 394603 341456 248384 773939 842604 263050 459417 491091 772364 449724 532477 825957 239398 888122 475160 239792 781444 212600 509036 343952 > 8155 [i]