Best Known (84, 159, s)-Nets in Base 8
(84, 159, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (84, 159, 208)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (84, 162, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 81, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 81, 104)-net over F64, using
(84, 159, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(84, 159, 225)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (83, 159, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
(84, 159, 326)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (84, 159, 326)-net over F8, using
(84, 159, 15016)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (84, 159, 15017)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (84, 158, 15017)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 48792 608974 207313 702677 452799 723375 415500 399064 803248 453649 332768 994867 720809 710198 997341 932872 365278 949278 053180 861630 707041 277932 681372 669176 > 8158 [i]