Best Known (83, 160, s)-Nets in Base 8
(83, 160, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (83, 160, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 80, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
(83, 160, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(83, 160, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
(83, 160, 302)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (83, 160, 302)-net over F8, using
(83, 160, 12871)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (83, 160, 12872)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (83, 159, 12872)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 391189 536031 221149 342539 157395 768447 951340 478959 300359 227452 882721 731348 567513 035640 993036 775390 294310 774413 683236 610962 480962 753588 561277 950026 > 8159 [i]