Best Known (95, 161, s)-Nets in Base 8
(95, 161, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 161, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 161, 354)-net over F8, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(95, 161, 605)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (95, 161, 605)-net over F8, using
(95, 161, 47868)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 161, 47869)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 24 977152 762744 749544 219823 092790 873526 571825 957114 202321 728296 015628 795915 009854 441282 839014 866812 293256 675172 689103 251739 258924 277481 732730 105580 > 8161 [i]