Best Known (102, 162, s)-Nets in Base 8
(102, 162, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (102, 162, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 162, 354)-net over F8, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(102, 162, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(102, 162, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (21, 81, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
(102, 162, 998)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (102, 162, 998)-net over F8, using
(102, 162, 129513)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (102, 162, 129514)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 199 835299 799883 967400 481959 328018 082636 811041 926055 753771 896937 401018 515016 264194 814796 363919 512864 834226 527102 284728 850876 501778 705902 000182 826096 > 8162 [i]