Best Known (98, 162, s)-Nets in Base 8
(98, 162, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (98, 162, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 162, 354)-net over F8, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(98, 162, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(98, 162, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 81, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
(98, 162, 724)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (98, 162, 724)-net over F8, using
(98, 162, 68162)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (98, 162, 68163)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 199 809030 668104 419988 932775 553641 897869 249185 030353 348545 575915 652289 911155 279473 089499 135249 602588 698415 401724 054030 775550 101875 732007 793114 711190 > 8162 [i]