Best Known (101, 163, s)-Nets in Base 8
(101, 163, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (101, 163, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 163, 354)-net over F8, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(101, 163, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(101, 163, 432)-net in base 8, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (101, 168, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
(101, 163, 876)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (101, 163, 876)-net over F8, using
(101, 163, 99392)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (101, 163, 99393)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1598 374343 150885 476926 097117 279267 318711 157934 049576 366587 148392 506904 003763 954487 750970 658289 109177 650067 266602 683803 035667 944263 280444 144620 462144 > 8163 [i]