Best Known (109, 168, s)-Nets in Base 8
(109, 168, 388)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (109, 168, 388)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 36, 34)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 33)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 33)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (73, 132, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (7, 36, 34)-net over F8, using
(109, 168, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(109, 168, 576)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (108, 168, 576)-net in base 8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (108, 172, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (22, 86, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 91, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 91, 288)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (22, 86, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (108, 172, 576)-net in base 8, using
(109, 168, 1353)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (109, 168, 1353)-net over F8, using
(109, 168, 264573)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (109, 168, 264574)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (109, 167, 264574)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6 546899 656540 870638 169025 272307 245889 908857 497143 766720 766674 559716 872616 757982 207159 356679 588078 128318 722183 539679 064570 104059 257953 508929 614461 409161 > 8167 [i]