Best Known (85, 168, s)-Nets in Base 8
(85, 168, 194)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (85, 168, 194)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (85, 193)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 85 and N(F) ≥ 194, using
(85, 168, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(85, 168, 225)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (83, 168, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
(85, 168, 282)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (85, 168, 282)-net over F8, using
(85, 168, 10970)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (85, 168, 10971)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (85, 167, 10971)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6 554999 171989 996414 276151 674488 290004 484099 502111 772494 366035 222130 836418 553041 783449 484761 118386 229851 972222 275903 484187 306458 727705 680738 888385 999292 > 8167 [i]