Best Known (119, 170, s)-Nets in Base 8
(119, 170, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (119, 170, 1026)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (114, 170, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
(119, 170, 3299)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (119, 170, 3299)-net over F8, using
(119, 170, 1851025)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (119, 170, 1851026)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (119, 169, 1851026)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 418 995763 502054 681812 390975 773719 674891 105845 103437 496679 238601 062804 710015 078331 900934 537729 339496 590165 900914 933242 155401 794018 824446 816420 430301 951280 > 8169 [i]