Best Known (102, 172, s)-Nets in Base 8
(102, 172, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (102, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
(102, 172, 384)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(102, 172, 384)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 86, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 91, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 78, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 78, 192)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 91, 192)-net in base 64, using
(102, 172, 662)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (102, 172, 662)-net over F8, using
(102, 172, 54454)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (102, 172, 54455)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 214614 672943 643722 203100 281542 205727 240357 287615 221027 533830 775298 246046 659598 531838 788209 095042 805692 838922 038298 620143 085464 374577 678399 592724 351143 034476 > 8172 [i]