Best Known (71, 172, s)-Nets in Base 8
(71, 172, 99)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (71, 172, 99)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 57, 34)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 33)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 33)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 115, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (7, 57, 34)-net over F8, using
(71, 172, 144)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (71, 172, 144)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 172, 144)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
(71, 172, 156)-Net in Base 8
(71, 172, 156)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (70, 172, 156)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (27, 129, 156)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 155)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 27 and N(F) ≥ 156, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 155)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (27, 129, 156)-net over F16, using
(71, 172, 3381)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (71, 172, 3382)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (71, 171, 3382)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 27049 966201 193738 737737 100636 752341 335205 187602 630081 055844 400811 353275 297800 679993 889957 746977 166321 625034 809019 592569 442175 858819 733257 498131 487327 462434 > 8171 [i]