Best Known (110, 173, s)-Nets in Base 8
(110, 173, 371)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (110, 173, 371)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 33, 17)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 16)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 16)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (77, 140, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 70, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 70, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (2, 33, 17)-net over F8, using
(110, 173, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(110, 173, 576)-net in base 8, using
- 81 times duplication [i] based on (109, 172, 576)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (108, 172, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (22, 86, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 91, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 91, 288)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (22, 86, 288)-net in base 64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (108, 172, 576)-net in base 8, using
(110, 173, 1150)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (110, 173, 1150)-net over F8, using
(110, 173, 181794)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (110, 173, 181795)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (110, 172, 181795)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 214533 999778 530205 604331 010406 145523 573197 806276 520240 045278 695929 496246 121266 224032 791011 068522 689748 981249 097434 142400 440704 952351 930118 445758 989734 214240 > 8172 [i]