Best Known (116, 173, s)-Nets in Base 8
(116, 173, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (116, 173, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 81 times duplication [i] based on digital (115, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
(116, 173, 1940)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (116, 173, 1940)-net over F8, using
(116, 173, 569437)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (116, 173, 569438)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (116, 172, 569438)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 214525 274847 318521 685510 095991 240240 942792 465230 534382 420747 694198 933617 945416 861660 709042 180831 046717 833564 951892 141759 101390 683156 052254 068134 475664 922417 > 8172 [i]