Best Known (12, 21, s)-Nets in Base 8
(12, 21, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (12, 21, 160)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (12, 22, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 11, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 11, 80)-net over F64, using
(12, 21, 165)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (12, 21, 165)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(821, 165, F8, 9) (dual of [165, 144, 10]-code), using
- 2 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 0) [i] based on linear OA(820, 162, F8, 9) (dual of [162, 142, 10]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(6410, 81, F64, 9) (dual of [81, 71, 10]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,71P) [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(6410, 81, F64, 9) (dual of [81, 71, 10]-code), using
- 2 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 0) [i] based on linear OA(820, 162, F8, 9) (dual of [162, 142, 10]-code), using
(12, 21, 10359)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (12, 21, 10360)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (12, 20, 10360)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1 153366 197441 188431 > 820 [i]