Best Known (19, 30, s)-Nets in Base 8
(19, 30, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (19, 30, 208)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (19, 32, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 16, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 16, 104)-net over F64, using
(19, 30, 477)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (19, 30, 477)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(830, 477, F8, 11) (dual of [477, 447, 12]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(830, 511, F8, 11) (dual of [511, 481, 12]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 511 = 83−1, defining interval I = [1,11], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 12 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(830, 511, F8, 11) (dual of [511, 481, 12]-code), using
(19, 30, 514)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(19, 30, 514)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (4, 15, 257)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 16, 257)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 12, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 12, 257)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 16, 257)-net in base 64, using
(19, 30, 64363)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (19, 30, 64364)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (19, 29, 64364)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 154 744654 049684 535559 760682 > 829 [i]