Best Known (20, 35, s)-Nets in Base 8
(20, 35, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 35, 160)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (20, 38, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 19, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 19, 80)-net over F64, using
(20, 35, 194)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (20, 35, 194)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (20, 36, 194)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 97)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 97, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 97)-net over F64, using
(20, 35, 11751)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 35, 11752)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 34, 11752)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 5 070755 449487 999781 122851 019783 > 834 [i]