Best Known (22, 36, s)-Nets in Base 8
(22, 36, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 36, 208)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (22, 38, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 19, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 19, 104)-net over F64, using
(22, 36, 265)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (22, 36, 265)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(836, 265, F8, 14) (dual of [265, 229, 15]-code), using
- 37 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 9 times 0, 1, 26 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(834, 226, F8, 14) (dual of [226, 192, 15]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(6417, 113, F64, 14) (dual of [113, 96, 15]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,98P) [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 113, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(6417, 113, F64, 14) (dual of [113, 96, 15]-code), using
- 37 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 9 times 0, 1, 26 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(834, 226, F8, 14) (dual of [226, 192, 15]-code), using
(22, 36, 300)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(22, 36, 300)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (4, 18, 150)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 21, 150)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 18, 150)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 18, 150)-net over F128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 21, 150)-net in base 64, using
(22, 36, 21291)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 36, 21292)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 324 595110 937714 422969 860182 732814 > 836 [i]