Best Known (26, 45, s)-Nets in Base 8
(26, 45, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 45, 208)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (26, 46, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 23, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 23, 104)-net over F64, using
(26, 45, 226)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (26, 45, 226)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (26, 46, 226)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 23, 113)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 112)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 113, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 112)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 23, 113)-net over F64, using
(26, 45, 15403)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 45, 15404)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 44, 15404)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 5447 054816 223492 595370 111867 478599 326869 > 844 [i]