MinT - Best Known (32, 48, s)-Nets in Base 8

Best Known (32, 48, s)-Nets in Base 8

Digital (32, 48, 354)-net over F₈, using

2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (32, 50, 354)-net over F₈, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 25, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
      - a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(32, 48, 518)-net in base 8, using

base change [i] based on digital (20, 36, 518)-net over F₁₆, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 259)-net over F₂₅₆, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F₂₅₆, using
    - Niederreiter sequence [i]

Digital (32, 48, 721)-net over F₈, using

embedding of OOA with Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(8⁴⁸, 721, F₈, 16) (dual of [721, 673, 17]-code), using
- 203 step VarÅ¡amovâ€“Edel lengthening with (r_i)Â = (2, 4 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 62 times 0, 1, 84 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(8⁴², 512, F₈, 16) (dual of [512, 470, 17]-code), using
  - 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(8⁴³, 513, F₈, 17) (dual of [513, 470, 18]-code), using
    - the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 513Â | 8⁶âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [0,8], and minimum distance dÂ â‰¥ |{−8,−7,…,8}|+1Â =Â 18 (BCH-bound) [i]

There is no (32, 48, 140968)-net in base 8, because

the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8^mÂ â‰¥ 22 301934 130549 421263 251113 288387 066009 173684 > 8⁴⁸ [i]