Best Known (30, 51, s)-Nets in Base 8
(30, 51, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 51, 208)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 54, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 27, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 27, 104)-net over F64, using
(30, 51, 258)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(30, 51, 258)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (30, 52, 258)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (4, 26, 129)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 28, 129)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 24, 129)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- the rational function field F128(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 24, 129)-net over F128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 28, 129)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (4, 26, 129)-net in base 64, using
(30, 51, 260)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (30, 51, 260)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(851, 260, F8, 21) (dual of [260, 209, 22]-code), using
- construction X with Varšamov bound [i] based on
- linear OA(850, 258, F8, 21) (dual of [258, 208, 22]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(6425, 129, F64, 21) (dual of [129, 104, 22]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,107P) [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(6425, 129, F64, 21) (dual of [129, 104, 22]-code), using
- linear OA(850, 259, F8, 20) (dual of [259, 209, 21]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 850 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 318 049696 282331 499963 882546 383698 991672 378816 [i]
- linear OA(80, 1, F8, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(80, s, F8, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(850, 258, F8, 21) (dual of [258, 208, 22]-code), using
- construction X with Varšamov bound [i] based on
(30, 51, 21193)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 51, 21194)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 50, 21194)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1427 451078 692485 029169 022485 073105 494576 227792 > 850 [i]