Best Known (32, 51, s)-Nets in Base 8
(32, 51, 256)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 51, 256)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (32, 54, 256)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 27, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 27, 128)-net over F64, using
(32, 51, 300)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(32, 51, 300)-net in base 8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (32, 54, 300)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (5, 27, 150)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (5, 28, 150)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 24, 150)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 24, 150)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (5, 28, 150)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (5, 27, 150)-net in base 64, using
(32, 51, 455)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (32, 51, 455)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(851, 455, F8, 19) (dual of [455, 404, 20]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(851, 511, F8, 19) (dual of [511, 460, 20]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 511 = 83−1, defining interval I = [1,19], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 20 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(851, 511, F8, 19) (dual of [511, 460, 20]-code), using
(32, 51, 61628)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 51, 61629)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 50, 61629)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1427 317607 012088 615975 243012 956124 912538 866564 > 850 [i]