Best Known (32, 52, s)-Nets in Base 8
(32, 52, 256)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 52, 256)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (32, 54, 256)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 27, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 27, 128)-net over F64, using
(32, 52, 300)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(32, 52, 300)-net in base 8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (32, 54, 300)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (5, 27, 150)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (5, 28, 150)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 24, 150)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 24, 150)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (5, 28, 150)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (5, 27, 150)-net in base 64, using
(32, 52, 381)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (32, 52, 381)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(852, 381, F8, 20) (dual of [381, 329, 21]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(852, 511, F8, 20) (dual of [511, 459, 21]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 511 = 83−1, defining interval I = [0,19], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 21 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(852, 511, F8, 20) (dual of [511, 459, 21]-code), using
(32, 52, 32126)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 52, 32127)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 91352 493348 876861 523207 824764 481673 428967 715659 > 852 [i]