Best Known (28, 53, s)-Nets in Base 8
(28, 53, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 53, 160)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (28, 54, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 27, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 27, 80)-net over F64, using
(28, 53, 162)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (28, 53, 162)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (28, 54, 162)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 27, 81)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 80)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 80)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 27, 81)-net over F64, using
(28, 53, 6182)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 53, 6183)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 52, 6183)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 91475 636375 977337 852604 888342 050045 020972 513612 > 852 [i]