Best Known (36, 57, s)-Nets in Base 8
(36, 57, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 57, 354)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (36, 58, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 29, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 29, 177)-net over F64, using
(36, 57, 509)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (36, 57, 509)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(857, 509, F8, 21) (dual of [509, 452, 22]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(857, 511, F8, 21) (dual of [511, 454, 22]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 511 = 83−1, defining interval I = [1,21], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(857, 511, F8, 21) (dual of [511, 454, 22]-code), using
(36, 57, 514)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(36, 57, 514)-net in base 8, using
- 81 times duplication [i] based on (35, 56, 514)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (21, 42, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 21, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 21, 257)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (21, 42, 514)-net over F16, using
(36, 57, 73815)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 57, 73816)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 56, 73816)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 374 171948 977115 817647 256867 995371 240190 631742 738922 > 856 [i]