Best Known (42, 79, s)-Nets in Base 8
(42, 79, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 79, 160)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 82, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 41, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 41, 80)-net over F64, using
(42, 79, 194)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (42, 79, 194)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 80, 194)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 40, 97)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 97, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 40, 97)-net over F64, using
(42, 79, 8828)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 79, 8829)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (42, 78, 8829)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 27645 458164 113970 903238 774108 142018 195968 515347 206116 760376 565136 782690 > 878 [i]