Best Known (61, 86, s)-Nets in Base 8
(61, 86, 416)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 86, 416)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (18, 30, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 15, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 15, 104)-net over F64, using
- digital (31, 56, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 28, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 28, 104)-net over F64, using
- digital (18, 30, 208)-net over F8, using
(61, 86, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(61, 86, 576)-net in base 8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (61, 90, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 45, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 49, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 42, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 42, 288)-net over F128, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 49, 288)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 45, 288)-net in base 64, using
(61, 86, 2916)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (61, 86, 2916)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(886, 2916, F8, 25) (dual of [2916, 2830, 26]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(886, 4101, F8, 25) (dual of [4101, 4015, 26]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(24) ⊂ Ce(22) [i] based on
- linear OA(885, 4096, F8, 25) (dual of [4096, 4011, 26]-code), using an extension Ce(24) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 84−1, defining interval I = [1,24], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 25 [i]
- linear OA(881, 4096, F8, 23) (dual of [4096, 4015, 24]-code), using an extension Ce(22) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 84−1, defining interval I = [1,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 23 [i]
- linear OA(81, 5, F8, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(81, s, F8, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(24) ⊂ Ce(22) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(886, 4101, F8, 25) (dual of [4101, 4015, 26]-code), using
(61, 86, 1884295)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 86, 1884296)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (61, 85, 1884296)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 57896 056508 576913 491685 492763 977946 842614 403751 339638 640091 860474 931460 583664 > 885 [i]