Best Known (57, 89, s)-Nets in Base 8
(57, 89, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (57, 89, 354)-net over F8, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (57, 100, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 50, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 50, 177)-net over F64, using
(57, 89, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(57, 89, 516)-net in base 8, using
- 81 times duplication [i] based on (56, 88, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (34, 66, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (34, 66, 516)-net over F16, using
(57, 89, 710)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (57, 89, 710)-net over F8, using
(57, 89, 102526)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (57, 89, 102527)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 237 150592 417990 503491 660738 166473 361571 176224 139612 672926 575520 295499 339762 243065 > 889 [i]