Best Known (59, 90, s)-Nets in Base 8
(59, 90, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (59, 90, 354)-net over F8, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (59, 104, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 52, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 52, 177)-net over F64, using
(59, 90, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(59, 90, 518)-net in base 8, using
- 82 times duplication [i] based on (57, 88, 518)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (35, 66, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 259)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (35, 66, 518)-net over F16, using
(59, 90, 896)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (59, 90, 896)-net over F8, using
(59, 90, 209403)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (59, 90, 209404)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (59, 89, 209404)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 237 153755 114940 834902 841328 284846 812914 116017 106943 635066 786835 724508 453646 932772 > 889 [i]