MinT - Best Known (63, 90, s)-Nets in Base 8

Best Known (63, 90, s)-Nets in Base 8

(63, 90, 399)-Net over F₈ — Constructive and digital

Digital (63, 90, 399)-net over F₈, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (9, 22, 45)-net over F₈, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 44)-sequence over F₈, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈ with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
2. digital (41, 68, 354)-net over F₈, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 34, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(63, 90, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive

(63, 90, 576)-net in base 8, using

4 times m-reduction [i] based on (63, 94, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 47, 288)-net in base 64, using
  - 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 49, 288)-net in base 64, using
    - base change [i] based on digital (9, 42, 288)-net over F₁₂₈, using
      - net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F₁₂₈, using
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₂₈ with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(63, 90, 2028)-Net over F₈ — Digital

Digital (63, 90, 2028)-net over F₈, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(63, 90, 1233100)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s

There is no (63, 90, 1233101)-net in base 8, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (63, 89, 1233101)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8^mÂ â‰¥ 237 144265 576897 017982 127619 965014 424503 549239 733199 731582 831724 552631 588102 966888 > 8⁸⁹ [i]