Best Known (51, 92, s)-Nets in Base 8
(51, 92, 256)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 92, 256)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 46, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
(51, 92, 266)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (51, 92, 266)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 46, 133)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 132)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 133, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 132)-sequence over F64, using
(51, 92, 15237)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 92, 15238)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (51, 91, 15238)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 15185 695682 540758 754498 321244 529514 237290 482543 582782 527154 082231 554484 312736 133384 > 891 [i]