Best Known (62−15, 62, s)-Nets in Base 81
(62−15, 62, 1198371)-Net over F81 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 62, 1198371)-net over F81, using
- 815 times duplication [i] based on digital (42, 57, 1198371)-net over F81, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8157, 1198371, F81, 15, 15) (dual of [(1198371, 15), 17975508, 16]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(8157, 8388598, F81, 15) (dual of [8388598, 8388541, 16]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8157, large, F81, 15) (dual of [large, large−57, 16]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523361 | 818−1, defining interval I = [0,7], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−7,−6,…,7}|+1 = 16 (BCH-bound) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8157, large, F81, 15) (dual of [large, large−57, 16]-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(8157, 8388598, F81, 15) (dual of [8388598, 8388541, 16]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8157, 1198371, F81, 15, 15) (dual of [(1198371, 15), 17975508, 16]-NRT-code), using
(62−15, 62, large)-Net over F81 — Digital
Digital (47, 62, large)-net over F81, using
- 811 times duplication [i] based on digital (46, 61, large)-net over F81, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 61, large)-net over F81, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(8161, large, F81, 16) (dual of [large, large−61, 17]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523360 | 814−1, defining interval I = [0,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(8161, large, F81, 16) (dual of [large, large−61, 17]-code), using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 61, large)-net over F81, using
(62−15, 62, large)-Net in Base 81 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 62, large)-net in base 81, because
- 13 times m-reduction [i] would yield (47, 49, large)-net in base 81, but