Best Known (10, 10+19, s)-Nets in Base 81
(10, 10+19, 182)-Net over F81 — Constructive and digital
Digital (10, 29, 182)-net over F81, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 9, 82)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- the rational function field F81(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- digital (1, 20, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- digital (0, 9, 82)-net over F81, using
(10, 10+19, 244)-Net over F81 — Digital
Digital (10, 29, 244)-net over F81, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (9, 29, 244)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 243)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 244, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 243)-sequence over F81, using
(10, 10+19, 44888)-Net in Base 81 — Upper bound on s
There is no (10, 29, 44889)-net in base 81, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (10, 28, 44889)-net in base 81, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 81m ≥ 273945 576874 393767 938750 271997 962883 439545 256614 592081 > 8128 [i]