Best Known (65−29, 65, s)-Nets in Base 81
(65−29, 65, 730)-Net over F81 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 65, 730)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 729)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 36 and N(F) ≥ 730, using
- the Hermitian function field over F81 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 36 and N(F) ≥ 730, using
(65−29, 65, 4549)-Net over F81 — Digital
Digital (36, 65, 4549)-net over F81, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(8165, 4549, F81, 29) (dual of [4549, 4484, 30]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8165, 6587, F81, 29) (dual of [6587, 6522, 30]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(28) ⊂ Ce(19) [i] based on
- linear OA(8157, 6561, F81, 29) (dual of [6561, 6504, 30]-code), using an extension Ce(28) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 6560 = 812−1, defining interval I = [1,28], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 29 [i]
- linear OA(8139, 6561, F81, 20) (dual of [6561, 6522, 21]-code), using an extension Ce(19) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 6560 = 812−1, defining interval I = [1,19], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 20 [i]
- linear OA(818, 26, F81, 8) (dual of [26, 18, 9]-code or 26-arc in PG(7,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(818, 81, F81, 8) (dual of [81, 73, 9]-code or 81-arc in PG(7,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(73,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(818, 81, F81, 8) (dual of [81, 73, 9]-code or 81-arc in PG(7,81)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(28) ⊂ Ce(19) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8165, 6587, F81, 29) (dual of [6587, 6522, 30]-code), using
(65−29, 65, large)-Net in Base 81 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 65, large)-net in base 81, because
- 27 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 38, large)-net in base 81, but