Best Known (26, 42, s)-Nets in Base 81
(26, 42, 936)-Net over F81 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 42, 936)-net over F81, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (26, 43, 936)-net over F81, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 10, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- digital (16, 33, 820)-net over F81, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8133, 820, F81, 17, 17) (dual of [(820, 17), 13907, 18]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 8-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(8133, 6561, F81, 17) (dual of [6561, 6528, 18]-code), using
- an extension Ce(16) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 6560 = 812−1, defining interval I = [1,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- OOA 8-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(8133, 6561, F81, 17) (dual of [6561, 6528, 18]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8133, 820, F81, 17, 17) (dual of [(820, 17), 13907, 18]-NRT-code), using
- digital (2, 10, 116)-net over F81, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(26, 42, 17726)-Net over F81 — Digital
Digital (26, 42, 17726)-net over F81, using
(26, 42, large)-Net in Base 81 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 42, large)-net in base 81, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 28, large)-net in base 81, but