Best Known (39, 53, s)-Nets in Base 81
(39, 53, 1198371)-Net over F81 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 53, 1198371)-net over F81, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8153, 1198371, F81, 14, 14) (dual of [(1198371, 14), 16777141, 15]-NRT-code), using
- OA 7-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(8153, 8388597, F81, 14) (dual of [8388597, 8388544, 15]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8153, large, F81, 14) (dual of [large, large−53, 15]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523360 | 814−1, defining interval I = [0,13], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8153, large, F81, 14) (dual of [large, large−53, 15]-code), using
- OA 7-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(8153, 8388597, F81, 14) (dual of [8388597, 8388544, 15]-code), using
(39, 53, large)-Net over F81 — Digital
Digital (39, 53, large)-net over F81, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(8153, large, F81, 14) (dual of [large, large−53, 15]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523360 | 814−1, defining interval I = [0,13], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
(39, 53, large)-Net in Base 81 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 53, large)-net in base 81, because
- 12 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 41, large)-net in base 81, but