Best Known (45, 61, s)-Nets in Base 81
(45, 61, 1048575)-Net over F81 — Constructive and digital
Digital (45, 61, 1048575)-net over F81, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8161, 1048575, F81, 16, 16) (dual of [(1048575, 16), 16777139, 17]-NRT-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(8161, 8388600, F81, 16) (dual of [8388600, 8388539, 17]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8161, large, F81, 16) (dual of [large, large−61, 17]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523360 | 814−1, defining interval I = [0,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8161, large, F81, 16) (dual of [large, large−61, 17]-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(8161, 8388600, F81, 16) (dual of [8388600, 8388539, 17]-code), using
(45, 61, large)-Net over F81 — Digital
Digital (45, 61, large)-net over F81, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(8161, large, F81, 16) (dual of [large, large−61, 17]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523360 | 814−1, defining interval I = [0,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
(45, 61, large)-Net in Base 81 — Upper bound on s
There is no (45, 61, large)-net in base 81, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (45, 47, large)-net in base 81, but