Best Known (22, 22+104, s)-Nets in Base 9
(22, 22+104, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 126, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
(22, 22+104, 88)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (22, 126, 88)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 126, 88)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 87)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 88, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 87)-sequence over F9, using
(22, 22+104, 487)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 126, 488)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 827164 449383 735704 345781 514131 541140 726321 908668 590829 581367 191316 359710 926026 588070 290231 129972 612100 258847 746787 401473 > 9126 [i]